Case of the ‘Christian’ Afghan: A New Angle in Psychological
by New Trend’s Media Monitor
Would you believe it? George Bush is anxious about the fate of an
Afghan who allegedly embraced Christianity. The Zionist media networks suddenly
came up with this story and started a worldwide campaign to save ‘Abdul Rahman’
from execution by an Afghan court bent on implementing Sharia, or so we are
told.
Readers who know anything about Afghanistan will wonder how such a clear
report about an Afghan "Christian" came out of a country where spectacular martyrdom operations against U.S. and coalition forces hardly make it to the
news.
Who is ‘Abdul Rahman?’ We are told that he converted to Christianity 16 years back. If Sharia says that a murtad [apostate] should be executed, how did ‘Abdul Rahman’ survive for 16 years? Ar you going to tell me that one can have a secret life in Afghanistan?
Did you think it is like New York, where you can worship the devil himself and have sex in any which way you can and no one cares? Did you think this is Washington, D.C. from where you can cook up a whole war based on WMDs and it takes 730 days before anyone finds out that Niger could not have sold uranium to Saddam because it had none to sell?
So for 16 years, no one ‘outed’ ‘Abdul Rahman’ in Afghanistan, a close knit country where the neighbors know how many eggs your chickens laid? Can you believe that!
The Taliban are reported to be the strongest for Sharia. ‘Abdul
Rahman’ managed to evade the Taliban. How come? Somewhat fishy, isn’t this
story? NOW THIS MAN FACING DEATH GETS TO TALK TO THE MEDIA! How many Muslim
prisoners in the U.S. have been allowed to talk to the media? [Zero!]
Now look at some details. We are told it was a custody case and his
ex-wife ‘outed’ him. It is claimed that a Bible was found in his possession. He
loves Christianity and the President of the United States is concerned that this
terrible violation of ‘Abdul Rahman’s religious rights might not be far off.
These reports ignore two serious issues:
1. The Afghan "government" was installed by America’s military
might. It has no legitimacy whatever. In fact, most observers agree that Karzai
and his entire coalition would collapse rapidly if U.S. and NATO troops were
withdrawn.
2. Any court set up under protection of a military occupation by
kafir forces has no legitimacy in Islam. Any ruling it hands down would be
illegitimate.
3. Under Islamic Law [Shar'ia], an apostate is killed only during
time of war if a court finds that he/she was using Islam as a cover to
infiltrate the Islamic system and then went back to another religion after having
done his job as a spy.
In Islamic History we can’t see any of an apostate is killed for
giving up Islam for a religion of his/her choice.
The case of ‘Abdul Rahman’ is being played up by the Zionists in a
attempt to paint Islam in colors provided by the Zionist media. In the U.S., Muslim
citizens have been sentenced to LIFE in prison merely for making a speech or
going to a Muslim country: LIFE in PRISON without any violent act
against the security of the U.S.
By contrast, Afghanistan is under military occupation, has
undergone decades of war, and does not have an Islamic government which could
be held to Islamic standards.
Hidden behind the story of the Afghan Christian might well be a
Zionist plan ro bring about conflict between Christian minorities and Muslim
majorities. This might be step three after the Danish cartoons
strategy and the Shia-Sunni strife in Iraq.
macmamembers@yahoogroups.com
